Prediction of Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs Naomi Broady Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs N. Broady
Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger
GEO
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
42
Age
35
-
Height
1.89m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
134
Best Rank
76
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$30.0K
Career Money
$330.0K
-
Plays
Right-handed (one-handed backhand)
Naomi Broady
GBR
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
2
Played
1
Win
42
Age
35
-
Height
1.89m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
134
Best Rank
76
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$30.0K
Career Money
$330.0K
-
Plays
Right-handed (one-handed backhand)
Head-to-head: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 1 - 1 Broady
They have played 5 sets in total, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 2 and Naomi Broady winning 3. The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Naomi Broady was at the Pozoblanco, 27-06-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger | 1 |
| Broady | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Pozoblanco(06-27-11)
Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger
3
6
6
Naomi Broady
6
1
2
(QF) Grenoble(01-24-11)
Naomi Broady
6
3
Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger
2
1
M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs N. Broady H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $29,995 | Career Prize Money | $329,987 |
| 53.24% (304-267) | Career Total W/L | 52.72% (378-339) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 10 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs N. Broady Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Naomi Broady has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naomi Broady has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naomi Broady has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Naomi Broady winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 216/155), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/5). Naomi Broady has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 111/87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 38/56).
- Player level: In the last year, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Naomi Broady has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 1 times and Naomi Broady being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger winning 2 and Naomi Broady winning 3.
- The last match between Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger and Naomi Broady was at the Pozoblanco, 27-06-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Naomi Broady has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naomi Broady has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naomi Broady has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Margalita Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs Naomi Broady Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs N. Broady H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 18 | Games Won | 18 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 0%, Broady 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 0%, Broady 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger 0%, Broady 0%.
M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Antalya - 12-12-2016 | ||||
R1  Ulrikke EikeriU. Eikeri | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q3  Esen KokceE. Kokce | W | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Telavi - 14-09-2015 | ||||
R2  Polina NovikovaP. Novikova | L | 7-6(10) 6-4 | ||
R1 Anna PribylovaA. Pribylova | W | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Beinasco - 23-02-2015 | ||||
R1  Gioia BarbieriG. Barbieri | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
N. Broady Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Birmingham Classic - Birmingham - 14-06-2021 | ||||
Q1  Kurumi NaraK. Nara | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| W15 Sharm El Sheikh - 22-02-2021 | ||||
R2  Svenja OchsnerS. Ochsner | L | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1  Dasha PlekhanovaD. Plekhanova | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| W25 Potchefstroom - 15-02-2021 | ||||
Q3  Alice RameA. Rame | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q1  Heike Janse Van VuurenH. Janse | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
M. Chakhnashvili-Ranzinger vs N. Broady Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.52% (304/264) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.72% (378/339) |
| 52.17% (686/629) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.93% (886/788) |
| 50.84% (6109/5908) | Games Win/Loss | 51.57% (8172/7674) |
| 48.96% (47/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.94% (178/152) |
| 58.22% (216/155) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.98% (26/25) |
| 42.71% (41/55) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.20% (136/106) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 40.43% (38/56) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 67 | Aces Total | 2453 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 213 | Total Double Faults | 1334 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 587.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 599.55 |
| 62% (2372/3855) | 1st Serve % | 58% (12987/22487) |
| 55% (1304/2372) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (9360/12987) |
| 41% (615/1483) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4130/9500) |
| 47% (193/413) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (879/2079) |
| 43% (1609/3719) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8507/21701) |
| 18.18% (4/18) | Slam W/L | 30.95% (13/29) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Masters W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38.78% (19/30) | Main Tour W/L | 42.20% (46/63) |
| 54.78% (235/194) | Challenger W/L | 54.37% (224/188) |
| 73.77% (45/16) | Futures W/L | 64.71% (88/48) |
| 53% (299/559) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (373/709) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (60/124) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (104/220) |
| 55% (99/179) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (111/247) |
| 87% (282/244) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (389/317) |
| 13% (282/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (389/71) |
| 21% (286/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (327/59) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:45 AM 15/11/25
Prediction
S. G. Zapicoq
R. Alujas4W1
2.92
W2
1.35
04:00 PM 15/11/25
PredictionL. Broadyq
J. Struff6W1
3.56
W2
1.24
05:05 AM 15/11/25
PredictionY. Kawahashi4
E. Zhu2W1
2.26
W2
1.56
10:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionS. PieriF. Gill5W1
2.97
W2
1.34
02:00 PM 15/11/25
PredictionM. Homberg
S. Fomin4W1
3.45
W2
1.26
08:00 AM 15/11/25
PredictionK. Uchida
E. Ymer7W1
1.81
W2
1.87
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
14 Nov 2025
Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Dan Added vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Jannik Sinner
Alex De Minaur16:05
H2H 12-0
Carlos Taberner
Tomas Barrios Vera02:35
H2H 0-1
Liam BroadyJan-Lennard Struff16:00
H2H 0-1
Alex BoltDane Sweeny07:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal